LUKE 15:11-32
Jesus disciples had recognized him as God’s Messiah and so Jesus set his face towards Jerusalem where he would fulfill God’s purpose through his death and resurrection. So Jesus determined to go to Jerusalem and on the way he is imparting his ‘kingdom vision’ to his disciples who would carry on his ‘mission’ after his departure (Luke 9:31, 51). Jesus had gathered a ‘new twelve’ around himself, but there was also a growing opposition among the ‘religious leaders’. Jesus’ claimed authority to forgive sins, he disregarded their 'Sabbath interpretations’ and he associated with ‘tax-collectors and sinners’. These became part of a growing division between Jesus and the ‘religious authorities of his day’.
Remember that
in Luke 15 "tax collectors and sinners” are gathering to hear Jesus, while the Pharisees
and the teachers of the law were muttering, “this man welcomes sinners and eats
with them (15:1-2).” So Jesus tells a parable of a shepherd who searches for
his one lost sheep and gathers his friends to celebrate when he finds it. This
is followed by a parable of a woman who loses one of her ten coins. She searches
her house and when she finds the lost coin she gathers her friends to
celebrate. Both stories conclude with comments about heaven rejoicing over 'repentant sinner’ (15:3-10). Again, among his original audience we find these
‘scribes and Pharisees’ who are actually angry that ‘sinners’ were drawing near
to hear Jesus.
So Jesus
tells a story of a man with two sons (15:11-32). The younger son asks for his share
of the estate. Evidently, he was more interested in his father’s wealth than being
with his father and enjoying fellowship with his father. Surprisingly, the father
divides the estate between his sons. The younger son gathers all his things and
leaves for a distant country. There he wastes his wealth on wild living and a
famine strikes that land. He takes the lowly and ‘unclean’ work of feeding pigs and even
longs to eat the pods the pigs were eating. He decides to return to his father.
His plan is to acknowledge his sin against heaven and against his father and he
hopes to become like one of his father’s workers.
While he was
still a long way off his father sees him with eyes of compassion and runs to his
wayward son and embraces him. Having received his father’s kiss, the son confesses
his sin and says how he is not worthy to be called the father’s son. The father
has the best robe put on his son, a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet.
They kill the fatten calf and the Father throws a big party to celebrate the return
of his lost son. The father had given his disrespectful son what he wanted and he
had left his father and wasted his wealth. Yet, when that son
returned his father had been waiting and watching for his lost son. The father runs
and embraces his son and will hear nothing of being a ‘hired worker’ and reinstates
his son and celebrates his return.
The older son
returns from the field and hears singing and dancing. When he finds out that
his father had killed the fattened calf to celebrate his brother’s return the
older son becomes angry and refused to celebration. The father comes out and
pleads with the older brother to come in and join the celebration. But the older
brother claims to have slaved for his father for years and to have never
disobeyed his father’s orders. He had ‘slaved for his father’ and ‘never
disobeyed his father’s orders’, but hadn’t received even a young goat to
celebrate with his friends. On the other hand, the ‘wayward and wasteful’ son
was receiving a feast with a ‘fattened calf’ and the older son was anger and refused
to come in (15:25-30).
The Father
says that the older son was always with him and that everything he had belonged
to the older son, but they had to celebrate because the brother was dead and
was now alive, he was lost and was now found. The older brother sees himself as
‘faithful’ as if that put the father in debt to the older son. But, the
older son lacks genuine loving devotion with his father. For him working with his father was 'slavery' and 'obeying orders’.
In reality, both
sons were void of any real love and devotion to their father. They didn’t want
relationship with the father. What they wanted was the father’s estate. They
just had two different methods of getting what they wanted. The
younger said, ‘give me my share and I’m out of here’. The older son said, ‘I’ve
been your slave and have obeyed your orders so you owe me what I want’. The
younger son came to his senses, returned to his father and saw himself as
unworthy and undeserving. So the question is will the older son see the errors
of his ways? Will the older son repent of his ‘works righteousness’ and his ‘demanding spirit’?
The bottom-line
for Jesus’ original audience was will the ‘scribes and Pharisees’ repent and
celebrate that the ‘sinners’ are coming to Jesus. For us today, we can easily seek to be, as Tim Keller says, seeking to be our own ‘Lord and
Savior’. We can do this by running away from God and doing our own thing, or we
can do it by being ‘very religious’ and doing good things for the wrong
reasons. The later method leads to a ‘self-righteousness’ that can become very self-deceptive. We can be good in an attempt to put God in our debt. We can seek God’s favor without having to repent and without any real loving relationship
with God Himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment