"The Shrewd Unjust Manager!"

Luke 16:1-15  

This is a great, but troubling story. Jesus statements about being faithful with little, being trustworthy with money, and faithful with what belongs to others are challenging and helpful. In addition we are told that we can’t serve two masters. We can have only one ultimate allegiance and we can’t serve both God and money. We are cautioned as Jesus refutes the Pharisees’ love of money and how they sought to justify themselves and their own action in the eyes of men; but God knew their hearts. (16:10-15)

However, this ‘unjust manager’ is commended even though he does not come across as either likable or worthy of praise. That the ‘unjust manager’ is used as an example and that he is commended is troubling. Jesus tells his disciples of a rich man who decided to terminate his manager for misusing his resources. The master called the manager to give an account of his management. Surely the master would not have let the manager go so easily if he was being a ‘good steward’ with the master’s assets. The manager realizes he is being sacked, but as he says he can’t dig and is ashamed to beg. He gets an idea so he calls his master’s debtors and reduces their debts considerably (20 months wages). The manager does this in order to be welcomed into homes once he losses his job. He was clever in looking out for his own interest, but it seems difficult to commend him since he had mismanaging things and he is described as 'unjust’. (16:1-9)

Curiously, the master commends the ‘unjust manager’ for acting shrewdly. This is surprising because the manager reduces the amount that the master’s debtors owed the master. But the master commends the manager for acting shrewdly in the manager’s own interest and to the master’s disadvantage. Some commentators say that the master was likely using an underhanded way of charging his debtors an overage or usury (see Exodus 22:25). If the manager removed the extra ‘interest’ or ‘usury’ than the master could not hold the manager responsible for the reduction without admitting his own wrongdoing. If so than the master may have seen the manager as acting shrewdly in the manager’s own interest and in the interest of the masters’ debtors. The master must have admired the way the manager used the situation in order to win friends that would feel obligated to help the manager once he was out of work.

Oddly, Jesus uses the example of an ‘unjust manager’ to teach his followers something about discipleship. So what can we learn from the ‘unjust manager’. This manager knew he was losing his job. He also knew that he couldn’t dig and that he was ashamed to beg. He called in the master’s debtors and reduced their debts. The masters’ debtors whose debts the manager reduced would be obligated to show the unemployed manager hospitality. Luke tells us that the children of this world are ‘more shrewd’ in dealing with their own kind than are the children of light. Jesus isn’t commending the manager’s dishonesty or the way he acted contrary to the interest of his employer. Jesus commends the manager’s shrewdness in winning friends that would welcome him into their homes. The manager was shrewd in using his position to meet his need to receive temporal hospitality.  

Jesus seems to be exhorting his disciples to use their wealth and influence in the interest of the kingdom and for the good of others. The previous parables would indicate that Jesus was thinking of ‘the lost’ (Luke 15) and ‘the marginalized and outcasts’ who were unable to return favors (14:13-24, 21). Jesus here encourages his disciples, including us, to use wealth in the interest of the kingdom of God. When we invest our resources in people for their good and for God’s glory we are acting ‘shrewdly’ and will receive eternal benefits. (16:8-9)

So the story concludes with appeals to be faithful and trustworthy stewards. What do we learn about being faithful with little things, with other people’s things and with true riches? The master commended the manager for his shrewdness in using his position to influence the debtors to show him favor because he had reduced their debts. Jesus wants us to use our position and our possessions to make friends for ourselves so that we may be received into eternal dwellings and eternal rewards. (Luke 16:8–9) Those unfaithful with little will be unfaithful with much. Those untrustworthy with money cannot be trusted with true riches. Also those who cannot be trustworthy with other people’s things cannot be trusted with their own property. (Luke 16:10–12)

Jesus makes it clear that we cannot serve two masters. You will love and be devoted to one and hate or despise the other or in other. We can only have one ultimate master and we cannot serve both ‘God and Money’. This was not popular talk among the Pharisees because we are told by the narrator (Luke) that the Pharisees’ loved money. So we leave the story with the Pharisees sneering at Jesus and the episode began with the Pharisees grumbling about Jesus associating with ‘tax-collectors and sinners’ (15:1-2). Jesus concludes by confronting these religious leaders for seeking to ‘justify themselves’ in the eyes of men. However, he assures them that God see right through them and knows their hearts and motives are not right. What they valued was looking good in the eyes of people, but the Jesus this was detestable before God!  (16:13-15)

 

The TWO Lost Sons!

LUKE 15:11-32 

Jesus disciples had recognized him as God’s Messiah and so Jesus set his face towards Jerusalem where he would fulfill God’s purpose through his death and resurrection. So Jesus determined to go to Jerusalem and on the way he is imparting his ‘kingdom vision’ to his disciples who would carry on his ‘mission’ after his departure (Luke 9:31, 51). Jesus had gathered a ‘new twelve’ around himself, but there was also a growing opposition among the ‘religious leaders’. Jesus’ claimed authority to forgive sins, he disregarded their 'Sabbath interpretations’ and he associated with ‘tax-collectors and sinners’. These became part of a growing division between Jesus and the ‘religious authorities of his day’.

Remember that in Luke 15 "tax collectors and sinners” are gathering to hear Jesus, while the Pharisees and the teachers of the law were muttering, “this man welcomes sinners and eats with them (15:1-2).” So Jesus tells a parable of a shepherd who searches for his one lost sheep and gathers his friends to celebrate when he finds it. This is followed by a parable of a woman who loses one of her ten coins. She searches her house and when she finds the lost coin she gathers her friends to celebrate. Both stories conclude with comments about heaven rejoicing over 'repentant sinner’ (15:3-10). Again, among his original audience we find these ‘scribes and Pharisees’ who are actually angry that ‘sinners’ were drawing near to hear Jesus.

So Jesus tells a story of a man with two sons (15:11-32). The younger son asks for his share of the estate. Evidently, he was more interested in his father’s wealth than being with his father and enjoying fellowship with his father. Surprisingly, the father divides the estate between his sons. The younger son gathers all his things and leaves for a distant country. There he wastes his wealth on wild living and a famine strikes that land. He takes the lowly and ‘unclean’ work of feeding pigs and even longs to eat the pods the pigs were eating. He decides to return to his father. His plan is to acknowledge his sin against heaven and against his father and he hopes to become like one of his father’s workers.

While he was still a long way off his father sees him with eyes of compassion and runs to his wayward son and embraces him. Having received his father’s kiss, the son confesses his sin and says how he is not worthy to be called the father’s son. The father has the best robe put on his son, a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. They kill the fatten calf and the Father throws a big party to celebrate the return of his lost son. The father had given his disrespectful son what he wanted and he had left his father and wasted his wealth. Yet, when that son returned his father had been waiting and watching for his lost son. The father runs and embraces his son and will hear nothing of being a ‘hired worker’ and reinstates his son and celebrates his return.

The older son returns from the field and hears singing and dancing. When he finds out that his father had killed the fattened calf to celebrate his brother’s return the older son becomes angry and refused to celebration. The father comes out and pleads with the older brother to come in and join the celebration. But the older brother claims to have slaved for his father for years and to have never disobeyed his father’s orders. He had ‘slaved for his father’ and ‘never disobeyed his father’s orders’, but hadn’t received even a young goat to celebrate with his friends. On the other hand, the ‘wayward and wasteful’ son was receiving a feast with a ‘fattened calf’ and the older son was anger and refused to come in (15:25-30).

The Father says that the older son was always with him and that everything he had belonged to the older son, but they had to celebrate because the brother was dead and was now alive, he was lost and was now found. The older brother sees himself as ‘faithful’ as if that put the father in debt to the older son. But, the older son lacks genuine loving devotion with his father. For him working with his father was 'slavery' and 'obeying orders’.

In reality, both sons were void of any real love and devotion to their father. They didn’t want relationship with the father. What they wanted was the father’s estate. They just had two different methods of getting what they wanted. The younger said, ‘give me my share and I’m out of here’. The older son said, ‘I’ve been your slave and have obeyed your orders so you owe me what I want’. The younger son came to his senses, returned to his father and saw himself as unworthy and undeserving. So the question is will the older son see the errors of his ways? Will the older son repent of his ‘works righteousness’ and his ‘demanding spirit’?

The bottom-line for Jesus’ original audience was will the ‘scribes and Pharisees’ repent and celebrate that the ‘sinners’ are coming to Jesus. For us today, we can easily seek to be, as Tim Keller says, seeking to be our own ‘Lord and Savior’. We can do this by running away from God and doing our own thing, or we can do it by being ‘very religious’ and doing good things for the wrong reasons. The later method leads to a ‘self-righteousness’ that can become very self-deceptive. We can be good in an attempt to put God in our debt. We can seek God’s favor without having to repent and without any real loving relationship with God Himself.  

Uncompromising Commitment!

Luke 14:25-35

So large crowds are following Jesus. Jesus turns to them and tells the crowd that to be his disciple they have to hate father, mother, spouse, children, brothers and sisters and life itself. He adds that unless a person will carry their cross and follow Jesus they cannot be his disciple. How can Jesus say we have to hate our close relatives and our own lives to be his disciple? Elsewhere Jesus tells us to love God with all our heart, soul, strength and mind, and to love our neighbor as we love ourselves. He even calls us to love our enemies (Luke 6:27, 10:27).  Clearly we are to love others as ourselves, but even more so we are to love God with all that we have and with all that are within us. Jesus also says that to serve two masters is to hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other (Luke 16:13). Evidently, Jesus is calling his disciples to follow him with the same level of devotion reserved for God Himself. Jesus is calling his disciples to love him as they love God and he will have no rivals. Matthew helps us to bring this all together? Matthew says that ‘whoever loves father or mother more than Jesus is not worthy of Jesus, and whoever loves son or daughter more than Jesus is not worthy of Jesus (Matthew 10:37).

This total allegiance to which Jesus is calling his disciples requires that we ‘count the cost’ of following him. After all we don’t want to water down our commitment so that we become poor examples, rather than a positive witness. So Jesus gives two scenarios in which potential followers are to sit and evaluate the cost of entering into a serious venture. In the first scenario you sit down and determine if you have the resources to build a tower. If the foundation is laid but the job is not completed due to a lack of funds, then those seeing the unfinished structure will mock and ridicule you (14:28-30). In the second scenario a king about to go to war sits to consider whether he is able to oppose the one coming against him with twice the number of troops. If not, he’ll send a delegation and ask for terms of peace. This followed by Jesus exhorts to his audience that they must give up everything to be Jesus’ disciple (14:31-33).

Again, we find Jesus calling followings to the highest level of commitment. All other relationships by comparison are like hate by contrast to the loyalty Jesus requires. He even calls us to be willing to die for him (14:26-27). Discipleship means allegiance to Jesus above all other claims. Disciples must be prepared to deny themselves and count the cost to avoid being like the foolish builder who runs out of funds or the army commander fails to evaluate the strength of the army opposing him. This section ends with words about salt being good, but when it loses its saltiness it isn’t even good enough for the soil or the manure pile. To start only to abandon the cause in tough times is like salt which has lost its taste and cannot be made useful again.

Why would anyone seeking followers for new movement make such extreme demands upon potential followers? Do you want to follow Jesus? You’ll have to put Jesus above family, give up your possessions, and pick up the implement of our own execution and follow Jesus! While Jesus is not denying the importance of family, he is saying that everything else must be put at risk for the sake of the kingdom. Followers of Jesus may be called to give up everything for the cause in order to overcome the opposition. The two pictures, the tower and the battle, both paint vivid pictures of the commitment needed.

Note that Israel was to be salt of the earth. They were to be the people through whom God’s world was to be kept wholesome and life was to be desirable and tasty. First century Israel was given this all-or-nothing challenge to either be the ‘salt of the earth’ or face their own ruin in devastating battle (A.D.70). This was true of first century Israel, but it is also a call to all the ‘followers of Jesus’ from any age to give Jesus our total allegiance. Our relationship with Jesus must be foremost and this is why the story ends with Jesus’ exhortation that if we don’t renounce all that we have we cannot be his disciple. (Luke 14:33)